A Role of Serum-Based Neuronal and Glial Markers as Potential Predictors for Distinguishing Severity and Related Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE: Optimal treatment decision and estimation of the prognosis in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is currently based on demographic and clinical predictors. But sometimes, there are limitations in these factors. In this study, we analyzed three central nervous system biomarkers in TBI patients, will discuss the roles and clinical applications of biomarkers in TBI. METHODS: From July on 2013 to August on 2014, a total of 45 patients were included. The serum was obtained at the time of hospital admission, and biomarkers were extracted with centrifugal process. It was analyzed for the level of S-100 beta (S100B), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1). RESULTS: This study included 33 males and 12 females with a mean age of 58.5 (19-84) years. TBI patients were classified into two groups. Group A was severe TBI with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 3-5 and Group B was mild TBI with GCS score 13-15. The median serum concentration of S100B, GFAP, and UCH-L1 in severe TBI were raised 5.1 fold, 5.5 fold, and 439.1 fold compared to mild injury, respectively. The serum levels of these markers correlated significantly with the injury severity and clinical outcome (p<0.001). Increased level of markers was strongly predicted poor outcomes. CONCLUSION: S100B, GFAP, and UCH-L1 serum level of were significantly increased in TBI according to severity and associated clinical outcomes. Biomarkers have potential utility as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic adjuncts in the setting of TBI.

Angiographically Progressive Change of Traumatic Pseudoaneurysm Arising from the Middle Meningeal Artery

Traumatic pseudoaneurysms of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) are rare phenomenon, which are usually associated with head trauma such as an underlying skull fracture. They were usually known to cause acute or delayed epidural hematomas but can be associated with subdural, subarachnoid, or even intracerebral hemorrhage. Sometimes, a high mortality rate was reported in these circumferences. But the natural course of these pseudoaneurysms is not well recognized. The indication and guideline of treatment for pseudoaneurysm are also unclear. This report describes a rare case of angiographically progressive change of traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the middle meningeal artery for one week, which was treated with endovascular embolization.

Clinical Study of a Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy after a Percutaneous Cholecystostomy

BACKGROUND: A laparoscopic cholecystectomy has many clinical advantages and is now recognize as the choice for treatment for gallstones. However a laparoscopic cholecystectomy is often not feasible or is converted to the conventional open method in patients with acute cholecystitis because of surrounding adhesion, tissue edema, and high postoperative complications. Lately, good clinical results have been reported by many authors for a percutaneous cholecystostomy followed by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Between January 1996 and March 1997, 56 acute cholecystitis patients were surgically treated in our institution. Thirteen patients underwent percutaneous drainage followed by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Group I). Also a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without a prior percutaneous cholecystostomy was attempted in 43 patients (Group II). RESULTS: There were no differences in the age and the sex distributions, the chief complaints on admission, and the severity of inflammation between the two groups. The only significant difference was the wall thickness of the gallbladder on postoperative pathologic examinations, 4.7 mm for Group I and 6.2 mm Group II (p=0.038). For the patients in Group I, percutaneous drainage of the gallbladder continued for 5.4 days on average, and the cholecystectomy was usually performed about 15 days later. A laparoscopic cholecystectomy was possible in 10 patients (76%) in Group I, but had to be converted to the open method in 3 patients. In Group II, only 17 patients (39.5%) out of 43 underwent a successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In other words, the open conversion rate was 24% in Group I and 60.5% in Group II. The wall thicknesses of the gallbladder excised laparoscopically were 3.98 mm and those of the conventionally removed gallbladder were 6.96 mm on average. This difference in the wall thickness was statistically significant (p=0.013) and was the only factor related with the open conversion rate. CONCLUSIONS: We think that a laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed several days after percutaneous drainage of the gallbladder to eliminate acute inflammation may be recommended for management of acute cholecystitis patients with severe clinical symptoms and ultrasonographic findings of marked gallbladder dilatation or pericholecystic fluid collection.